Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Edessa, post: 4864243, member: 84065&quot;]Thanks for the clarification! I don&#039;t have Duplessy and was struggling with the Poey listings (numbers 1546 to 1598). But understanding that at a couple of points in the listing Poey says that &quot;After Hebert, this coin type becomes banal and any further classification would be illusory&quot;. And later &quot;It would be difficult, in my opinion, and of little benefit to science to seek order in this chaos&quot;. Such a great post to show that Chaos has succumbed to Order through the great research of Duplessy. The immobilization of types is an interesting field of study.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in