Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;+VGO.DVCKS, post: 4864202, member: 110504&quot;]Many thanks, [USER=84065]@Edessa[/USER] ...and everybody else.</p><p>Um, Edessa, I&#039;m sorry to do this, but the Advancement of Science constrains me somewhat.&nbsp; Your example is much closer to Duplessy 399, c. late 11th-early 12th c., circa Helie de La Fleche.&nbsp; For the whole series, Duplessy has a total of six variants and subvariants, arranged chronologically.&nbsp; Without fiddling with Poey on Google Books, I suspect even he wasn&#039;t as thourough as that.&nbsp; Boudeau, the early-20th-c. equivalent of Duplessy, only lists two (170, 171), the original and all subsequent issues.&nbsp; --And I cited the wrong one for my first example, the initial posthumous 11th-century one.&nbsp; ...Because, Wait for it, when I first catalogued it, I was sure it <i>was</i> a lifetime issue.&nbsp; Nope, just the same century.&nbsp; Missed that during the writeup; dumbly, since the whole impetus of the article was finally getting a &#039;real&#039; one.</p><p>But it sounds like you can appreciate the coolness of the entire range of the history.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in