Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Sean5150, post: 2723712, member: 75607&quot;]Isnt that what they&#039;re doing? I mean, pretend instead of the + the grade was 67.5. The same CAC guidelines would be in place for that grade. I don&#039;t know the true answer, if they specifically ignore + grades, but that would seem silly to me. What if a + coin doesn&#039;t bean? Does that mean it&#039;s low for MS67 or just low for MS67+? I think there may be some assumptions but it makes sense to me that the + IS a grade, just in between two whole numbers. Otherwise, like previously stated, why get a bean at all? I guess to reinforce the original grade, but that would mean their rules need to apply to that specific + grade or else it makes no sense. And you proved that to be true by saying the + with a bean has more of a premium, just for the fact that it could have not beaned. Since there was a chance it could have not beaned, that means they scrutinize the coin at the stated grade, not the whole number grade? Or not. But think about it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in