Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Thirty pieces of silver
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="EWC3, post: 4545337, member: 93416"]@<a href="https://www.cointalk.com/members/roerbakmix.100731/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/members/roerbakmix.100731/">Roerbakmix</a> many thanks for the detailed reply. I suspect we might be at cross purposes here. I would expect people in the medical sciences – (in contexts therefore where controlled experiments rule) – to throw the statistical kitchen sink at their subjects of research. I would be very concerned if they did not. So no criticism at all of your professional activity. Regarding publication of your papers – it depends upon context – in specialist literature I see no problems with leaving terms in well known equations undefined.</p><p><br /></p><p>Gorard was quite specific however in levelling his criticism at people in humanities – and for myself I was talking about historical matters – and that's way outside anything that is a scientifically controlled experiment. And additionally, people who write for the general public - yet bang out long equations without a key to the meaning of the terms involved - deserve exemplary criticism in my view.</p><p><br /></p><p>On the specific point however, you seemed to support this position</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Surely I read that correctly as saying - ‘any number is as likely as any other’ – which is surely wrong. Doug immediately pointed out numbers like 30 get cultural preference, and a mass of carefully read text followed on - to back that up. I was going a step further by a careful consideration of contemporary monetary metrology. So I stand by my initial position there, I think you were wrong to (appear to?) back [USER=82549]@gsimonel[/USER]</p><p><br /></p><p>Rob T</p><p><br /></p><p>PS For my own part I passed many a happy hour looking into foundations of maths, and I suspect you yourself realize - if we throw that kitchen sink at “any number is as likely as any other” - we quickly sink into paradox. So I am not going to do that – I would be breaking my own code of conduct <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="EWC3, post: 4545337, member: 93416"]@[URL='https://www.cointalk.com/members/roerbakmix.100731/']Roerbakmix[/URL] many thanks for the detailed reply. I suspect we might be at cross purposes here. I would expect people in the medical sciences – (in contexts therefore where controlled experiments rule) – to throw the statistical kitchen sink at their subjects of research. I would be very concerned if they did not. So no criticism at all of your professional activity. Regarding publication of your papers – it depends upon context – in specialist literature I see no problems with leaving terms in well known equations undefined. Gorard was quite specific however in levelling his criticism at people in humanities – and for myself I was talking about historical matters – and that's way outside anything that is a scientifically controlled experiment. And additionally, people who write for the general public - yet bang out long equations without a key to the meaning of the terms involved - deserve exemplary criticism in my view. On the specific point however, you seemed to support this position Surely I read that correctly as saying - ‘any number is as likely as any other’ – which is surely wrong. Doug immediately pointed out numbers like 30 get cultural preference, and a mass of carefully read text followed on - to back that up. I was going a step further by a careful consideration of contemporary monetary metrology. So I stand by my initial position there, I think you were wrong to (appear to?) back [USER=82549]@gsimonel[/USER] Rob T PS For my own part I passed many a happy hour looking into foundations of maths, and I suspect you yourself realize - if we throw that kitchen sink at “any number is as likely as any other” - we quickly sink into paradox. So I am not going to do that – I would be breaking my own code of conduct :)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Thirty pieces of silver
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...