Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 1512802, member: 112&quot;]Yeah I know. And I know why. It is because before the two companies (ICG and ANACS) traded places ANACS had been considered to have much tougher grading standards than ICG did. In fact, there was a time when ANACS was considered to have tougher grading standards than NGC had.</p><p><br /></p><p>People remember those things. And a whole lot of people are not aware of the changes that took place with ANACS. To them, ANACS is the same company it always was operating on the same old grading standards that it always used. So they think that ANACS is still a better TPG than ICG is.</p><p><br /></p><p>If they knew, or were aware of the truth, they probably would not think that way. Or at least they shouldn&#039;t.</p><p><br /></p><p>The point is, just because the market in general, (or the majority of collectors if you prefer to say it that way).&nbsp; has a certain perception, that does not mean that perception is correct or valid.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in