Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Payton, post: 848489, member: 22129&quot;]I have had the old margin discussion with TPG&#039;s until I feel like screaming.&nbsp; Often times it seems like talking in circles.&nbsp; First of all the scan or pic of the note in the PCGS 67 holder looks like the note is pregnant with the bulging sides.&nbsp; The PMG image looks a little more representative.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In any event the right margin appears about 50% larger than the left.&nbsp; I have great respect for both TPG&#039;s but I have had absolute pristine notes with new embossing come back at CU64 due to margins that were not quite as &quot;off&quot; as this example.&nbsp; IMHO, the continued inconsistency of margin grading take aways (or lack of) should probably be addressed once and for all.&nbsp; &nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>If this note was in a CGX holder at a 67 I would just say &quot;so what else is new&quot;.&nbsp; Must have been submitted by Ahmet, &quot;the Spin man&quot; (JVS), Michael A, Jack,&nbsp; etc.....</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>So Brian to your point.&nbsp; I think that PMG and PCGS&nbsp; graded stuff will generally mirror each other.&nbsp; If the example you posted is otherwise pristine, I would have hung a 64 on it due the margins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in