Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
These IHC and Shield Nickel RPDs could be brothers...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="KurtS, post: 2123837, member: 11786"]Because I know a lot more about RPDs on Indian Cents than Shield Nickels, I've been doing some comparing between the two. Today, I just happened to see two RPDs on an IHC and a Shield Nickel that look so alike, they could almost be "brothers". Granted, the digit shapes and spacing differ, but the actual RPDs are strikingly similar. This suggests to me that both IHC and Shield Nickel dies were dated using the same process.</p><p><br /></p><p>In both cases, there are similar details worth noting. When a date is repunched in a die, there's often a rotational aspect. In other words, the digits have different degrees of spread, due to this rotation. And typically there is some separation between the underlying punch and the final digit. You see that below as a gap between the top of the 67 and the underlying date. This is caused when mint workers attempt to polish away the mistake, but leave traces of underlying digits--such as where the top stroke of the 6 is reduced to a faint line. I have seen exceptions too, such as where the first digits are pressed so deeply as to change the shape of final digit--like as the "9" in the second picture. In this case, the outer size of the digit is expanded, but the inner loop will be made smaller.</p><p><br /></p><p>Of course, bronze and CuNi coins strike up differently, with different degrees of machine doubling seen. This should also be taken into account when evaluating a coin for an RPD. I admit, I need to look at a lot more Shield Nickels to correctly distinguish RPDs from more common MD.</p><p><br /></p><p>Top: 1867/67 Snow-1 IHC. Bottom: Shield Nickel in PCGS slabbed as "minor variety"--although the RPD is not minor at all.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8739/16851215447_66abe90a68_z.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Some repunching actually changes the shape of the final digit on the 1889 Snow-4. The colored overlays show the spread between repunchings.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8589/16799250485_0975d85a60_o.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="KurtS, post: 2123837, member: 11786"]Because I know a lot more about RPDs on Indian Cents than Shield Nickels, I've been doing some comparing between the two. Today, I just happened to see two RPDs on an IHC and a Shield Nickel that look so alike, they could almost be "brothers". Granted, the digit shapes and spacing differ, but the actual RPDs are strikingly similar. This suggests to me that both IHC and Shield Nickel dies were dated using the same process. In both cases, there are similar details worth noting. When a date is repunched in a die, there's often a rotational aspect. In other words, the digits have different degrees of spread, due to this rotation. And typically there is some separation between the underlying punch and the final digit. You see that below as a gap between the top of the 67 and the underlying date. This is caused when mint workers attempt to polish away the mistake, but leave traces of underlying digits--such as where the top stroke of the 6 is reduced to a faint line. I have seen exceptions too, such as where the first digits are pressed so deeply as to change the shape of final digit--like as the "9" in the second picture. In this case, the outer size of the digit is expanded, but the inner loop will be made smaller. Of course, bronze and CuNi coins strike up differently, with different degrees of machine doubling seen. This should also be taken into account when evaluating a coin for an RPD. I admit, I need to look at a lot more Shield Nickels to correctly distinguish RPDs from more common MD. Top: 1867/67 Snow-1 IHC. Bottom: Shield Nickel in PCGS slabbed as "minor variety"--although the RPD is not minor at all. [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8739/16851215447_66abe90a68_z.jpg[/IMG] Some repunching actually changes the shape of the final digit on the 1889 Snow-4. The colored overlays show the spread between repunchings. [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8589/16799250485_0975d85a60_o.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
These IHC and Shield Nickel RPDs could be brothers...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...