Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CheetahCats, post: 1002396, member: 23874&quot;]That&#039;s indeed what I also said above in a previous post pursuant to Breen&#039;s stated tolerance / variance.&nbsp; The OP&#039;s is just slightly lesser.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>As per another page in coinfacts, <a href="http://www.coinfacts.com/two_cents/two_cents_by_date.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinfacts.com/two_cents/two_cents_by_date.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.coinfacts.com/two_cents/two_cents_by_date.html</a><font size="2">:</font></p><p><font size="2"></font><blockquote><p><font size="2"><i>&quot;Although&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the master hub didn’t change during most of this period (a new hub was introduced in 1871, but this did not change the legend variety) the&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; date digits were punched into the dies by hand. As a result of this policy&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; there are numerous date varieties to be collected including the 1865/4 and&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1869/8 overdates.&quot;</i></font></p></blockquote><p>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in