Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1505896, member: 26302&quot;]I understand what you are saying sir, but I would disagree with a sticky. The reason is legal. Once an organization starts to go down a path like that, the lawyers can always make an argument as to WHY did you only go that far, why did you not go further with warnings. Its sad, but in this day and age we are efectively forbidden by legal reasoning from doing some things to help people. If CT posted SOME warnings in the BST area, then in the future some lawyer could argue, &quot;You posted warnings about 5 things, WHY didn&#039;t you post a warning about XXXXX?&quot;, and then try to hold CT culpable for a deal gone bad.</p><p><br /></p><p>I don&#039;t like any more than you probably do, but its the sad truth nowadays. I believe the only changes CT could make could be to adjust post count or length of time requirements to the BST area. Nothing will ever make it unscammable unfortunately.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in