Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The Value of Provenance - Tony Abramson's Dark Age Coins (Part 2)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roerbakmix, post: 7949668, member: 100731"]Just to soothen the pain a bith: as all my bids failed, I had some extra budget, and bought (via other sources):</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1377140[/ATTACH]</p><p>Series E var G5 "XAZA" type. The obverse of this coin is one of the few continental sceats that bear a legend (XAZA; meaning unknown). They are relatively scarce, but not rare per se. The reverse is typical for series E var G, however, there are three specimens known wich pair the G5 obverse with an unusual reverse: a clerical symbol (?) and the legend VVILLI[...] - perhaps standing for Willibrord. Tony sold two of these: in part I a specimen that went for > 1000 GBP, and in part III a similar specimen that sold for 500 GBP (my max was 450 GBP; it was the main aim of the auction). </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1377143[/ATTACH]</p><p>I bought this one (series E, probably subvar i) from [USER=87271]@AnYangMan[/USER]. His photo is better:</p><p><br /></p><p>I bought this coin for two reasons:</p><p>1) it's in pristine condition, with a remarkably sharp toning on the reverse. </p><p>2) there is something unusual going on at the obverse: </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1377145[/ATTACH]</p><p>Below the thick lines of the spines, there are thin stripes, barely visible with the naked eye. My hypothesis is that the engraver carved an outline with a sharp chisel, and then used a broader chisel to engrave over these guidelines. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1377148[/ATTACH]</p><p>This is a purchase of a few months old. It's a very abstract series G - just compare it to the one of [USER=109923]@John Conduitt[/USER], which is (probably) earlier and more resembling the Merovingian deniers of the monetarius Adalsar (also sold in part I)</p><p><br /></p><p>I also had my eye on the WIGRAED and TILBERTH series R (8 and 10) sceatta's in part III. They didn't go that high, but as my main goal of the auction was one of the last coins, I didn't go all in. WIGRAED and TILBERTH sceatta's are the first sceatta's bearing the name of the monetarius (probably). This is my WIGRAED:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1377149[/ATTACH]</p><p>Together with [USER=73099]@Nap[/USER], I conducted a die-study on the WIGRAED coins. We identified about 80 specimens, with this die being the rarest.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roerbakmix, post: 7949668, member: 100731"]Just to soothen the pain a bith: as all my bids failed, I had some extra budget, and bought (via other sources): [ATTACH=full]1377140[/ATTACH] Series E var G5 "XAZA" type. The obverse of this coin is one of the few continental sceats that bear a legend (XAZA; meaning unknown). They are relatively scarce, but not rare per se. The reverse is typical for series E var G, however, there are three specimens known wich pair the G5 obverse with an unusual reverse: a clerical symbol (?) and the legend VVILLI[...] - perhaps standing for Willibrord. Tony sold two of these: in part I a specimen that went for > 1000 GBP, and in part III a similar specimen that sold for 500 GBP (my max was 450 GBP; it was the main aim of the auction). [ATTACH=full]1377143[/ATTACH] I bought this one (series E, probably subvar i) from [USER=87271]@AnYangMan[/USER]. His photo is better: I bought this coin for two reasons: 1) it's in pristine condition, with a remarkably sharp toning on the reverse. 2) there is something unusual going on at the obverse: [ATTACH=full]1377145[/ATTACH] Below the thick lines of the spines, there are thin stripes, barely visible with the naked eye. My hypothesis is that the engraver carved an outline with a sharp chisel, and then used a broader chisel to engrave over these guidelines. [ATTACH=full]1377148[/ATTACH] This is a purchase of a few months old. It's a very abstract series G - just compare it to the one of [USER=109923]@John Conduitt[/USER], which is (probably) earlier and more resembling the Merovingian deniers of the monetarius Adalsar (also sold in part I) I also had my eye on the WIGRAED and TILBERTH series R (8 and 10) sceatta's in part III. They didn't go that high, but as my main goal of the auction was one of the last coins, I didn't go all in. WIGRAED and TILBERTH sceatta's are the first sceatta's bearing the name of the monetarius (probably). This is my WIGRAED: [ATTACH=full]1377149[/ATTACH] Together with [USER=73099]@Nap[/USER], I conducted a die-study on the WIGRAED coins. We identified about 80 specimens, with this die being the rarest.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The Value of Provenance - Tony Abramson's Dark Age Coins (Part 2)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...