Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;bahabully, post: 1036495, member: 17555&quot;]I think it&#039;s absolutely relevant to the intent of this thread.... it enables a view of apples to apples date and grade and tpg, where the most significant variable should be &quot;tone&quot;... so it provides an opportunity for toner specialists to jump in and explain why they believe one coin drove such a higher premium than the other..</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>could it be the toned reverse ?</p><p>could it be the colors or toning pattern ?</p><p>could it be someone overpaid and someone underpaid ?</p><p>could it be that there isn&#039;t any significant difference and no one really knows ?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Something I find very interesting is the delta between what Shane guessed and what Lehigh guessed,, both of whom I would consider very in on toner market activity. A 20% difference between Lehigh&#039;s guess and Shanes, with Shane approximating my paid amount nicely and Lehigh approximating your paid amount nicely..... That&#039;s 20% ! on the same coin ! with only primary difference the toning !</p><p>Now if neither of them can&#039;t pony up reasons for the difference, then what&#039;s the purpose of this thread again ?,,, other than to illustrate that toning costs directly correlate to black magic, lava rocks, and scrambled eggs.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in