Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The Toning Premium Thread Part 2
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="brg5658, post: 2796807, member: 29751"]<font face="Verdana"><font size="4">The NGC</font> <font size="6">⋆ </font><font size="4">designation is more subjective than one may think. When graded, if <i>any </i>of the graders or finalizer disagree with the star designation, it is not awarded. </font></font></p><p><font face="Verdana"><font size="4"><br /></font></font></p><p><font face="Verdana"><font size="4">It is also not <i>only </i>awarded for pretty colors and toning. </font></font></p><p><font face="Verdana"><font size="4"><br /></font></font></p><p><font face="Verdana"><font size="4">It can be given to MS coins for "eye appeal" including beautiful toning, for superb/exceptional luster, or for <i>nearly </i>prooflike surfaces. </font></font></p><p><font face="Verdana"><font size="4"><br /></font></font></p><p><font face="Verdana"><font size="4">On proof coins, it can mean many things -- sometimes more than one thing, and it leaves the owner guessing what it means. On proofs it can be given for nice toning, nearly cameo contrast (on non-cameo coins), or nearly ultra cameo contrast (on cameo but non-ultra-cameo coins). It can also be given if a coin is fully cameo (or ultra-cameo) on one side, but not on both sides.</font></font></p><p><font face="Verdana"><font size="4"><br /></font></font></p><p><font face="Verdana"><font size="4">For the set of coins posted by [USER=87737]@Beefer518[/USER] , I would guess he paid $185. Just a WAG.</font></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="brg5658, post: 2796807, member: 29751"][FONT=Verdana][SIZE=4]The NGC[/SIZE] [SIZE=6]⋆ [/SIZE][SIZE=4]designation is more subjective than one may think. When graded, if [I]any [/I]of the graders or finalizer disagree with the star designation, it is not awarded. It is also not [I]only [/I]awarded for pretty colors and toning. It can be given to MS coins for "eye appeal" including beautiful toning, for superb/exceptional luster, or for [I]nearly [/I]prooflike surfaces. On proof coins, it can mean many things -- sometimes more than one thing, and it leaves the owner guessing what it means. On proofs it can be given for nice toning, nearly cameo contrast (on non-cameo coins), or nearly ultra cameo contrast (on cameo but non-ultra-cameo coins). It can also be given if a coin is fully cameo (or ultra-cameo) on one side, but not on both sides. For the set of coins posted by [USER=87737]@Beefer518[/USER] , I would guess he paid $185. Just a WAG.[/SIZE][/FONT][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The Toning Premium Thread Part 2
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...