Regardless of the problems that may exist with this coin, I believe it did sell for more money than a non toner. Maybe $500 over FMV ??? The previous, ugly duckling SAE sold for about 10 x FMV (MS68) for it's color. Also from eBay. I'm starting to see a pattern here.
IMO it looks like the same coin. I'm basing that by the dot on the nose (showing on the proof) directly across from the bottom of the eye. I believe I can still see it on the toned coin. Could also be that I'm suffering from a case of pareidolia.
By popular demand. (Or not) "inside the box". Third times the charm... (please hold back if you are familiar with this one) 1881S Morgan. PCGS - MS66+ Guide price is $300 How much did this one sell for ???
It’s NT in my opinion. However, I think the photo is a bit enhanced and that the coin might be more dull in hand.
Will post the reveal tomorrow (Sun) While we wait, here's a link to a thread (CU) of toned Morgans it is worth a look. https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1026148/a-few-quality-toned-morgans#latest
A prime example of pics, that hide flaws (-s) while highlighting the colors and other attributes (+s). "Juiced photos." I will say that they (all but 1) are graded gem or better. You had mentioned juiced pics.
The reveal.... The lofty sale price was $1997.50 @ddddd wins the round. And the full slab pic.. Look familiar anyone ???
I was nice and didn't say anything about the old "Ed Wood" after the fact grading, and price guessing methodology that was applied here.