Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;oval_man, post: 1503371, member: 22602&quot;]<font size="2"><font face="verdana"></font></font></p><p><font size="2"><font face="verdana"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="2"><font face="verdana">You&#039;re too modest. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Thanks for your sense of that. I guess I think of album toning as more pronouncedly &quot;ring-like.&quot; Envelop toning makes more sense to me.</font></font></p><p><font size="2"><font face="verdana"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="2"><font face="verdana"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="2"><font face="verdana"></font></font><font face="verdana"></font></p><p><font face="verdana">Good points, particularly the third, which sorta sums everything up.</font></p><p><font face="verdana"><br /></font></p><p><font face="verdana">Bottom line, I can&#039;t imagine this obverse to have been ATed (based on what I learned on the Toning Premium Thread). If it were, the boundary between NT and AT could be considered to have been erased—and I don&#039;t have the sense that anyone here thinks we&#039;re there yet. So, the questionable side would have to be the reverse. Given this, I&#039;m more persuaded by your second point than your first—but mostly think the odds are much greater that this is an original coin.</font></p><p><font face="verdana"><br /></font></p><p><font face="verdana">Thanks again for indulging my &quot;speculating.&quot;</font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in