Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jamesicus, post: 2821436, member: 14873&quot;]I have now read ..........</p><p><br /></p><p>GALERIUS AND THE WILL OF DIOCLETIAN, William Lewis Leadbetter, Routledge, New York, (2013)</p><p><br /></p><p>.......... for the second time. Despite its title, I think this highly acclaimed Biography/Historical Treatise offers the most detailed and accurate examination and explanation of the organization and function of the Diocletian inspired Tetrarchies.</p><p><br /></p><p>After that re-read I have updated and re-written my Tetrarchic web page (particularly the Carnuntum Conference section) at:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://jp29.org/ctet.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://jp29.org/ctet.htm" rel="nofollow">http://jp29.org/ctet.htm</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Inasmuch as the information on this web page relates to coinage of the Tetrarchies catalogued and described in THE ROMAN IMPERIAL COINAGE (RIC), Volume VI, I employ the Imperial name forms used in the headers by Sutherland here. The following depiction includes the alternate name forms frequently used by collectors, dealers and authors of historical texts and reference documents:</p><p><br /></p><p>DIOCLETIAN ........................ (no other names commonly used)</p><p>MAXIMIAN HERCULIUS ........ Maximianus, Herculius</p><p>CONSTANTIUS .................... Constantius I, Constantius Chlorus</p><p>GALERIUS MAXIMIAN ......... Galerius</p><p>SEVERUS ............................. Severus II,</p><p>MAXIMINUS .......................... Maximinus II, Maximinus Daia, Daza</p><p>CONSTANTINE ..................... Constantine I, Constantinus</p><p>MAXENTIUS .......................... (no other names commonly used)</p><p>LICINIUS ................................ Licinius I, Licinius Licinianus[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in