Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The strange EIOVΛI
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Jochen1, post: 3351099, member: 103829"]You have asked for the early 3rd century. Here I have listed the coins from Severus (193-211) until Gordian III (238-244). Thereafter the mint was closed.</p><p>Referring to Hristova/Hoeft/Jekov (2018) in this time 2561 different types were issued. I focus on signed coins (with the name of the governor on it), that makes 1341 types altogether:</p><p>Severus 271</p><p>Domna 35</p><p>Caracalla 160</p><p>Plautilla 40</p><p>Geta 62</p><p>Macrinus 234</p><p>Diadumenia 165</p><p>Elagabal 277</p><p>Gordian III 97</p><p><br /></p><p>1) Severus (193-211) 271 sign. coins (with EI 6.3%)</p><p>under Auspex (193-195) 21 types</p><p>1x NIKOPOLEITWN = 4.8%</p><p>under Gentianus (195-198) 15 types</p><p>always NIKOPOLITWN</p><p>under Tertullus (198-201) 52 types</p><p>1x NIKOPOLEITWN = 1.9%</p><p>under Gallus (201-204) 168 types</p><p>11x NIKOPOLEITWN = 6.5%</p><p>4x NEIKOPO = 2.4%</p><p>under Ulpianus (210-213) 15 types</p><p>always NIKOPOLITWN</p><p><br /></p><p>2) Domna (193-211) 35 sign. coins (with EI 28.6%)</p><p>under Tertullus (198-201) 9 types</p><p>1x NIKOPOLEITWN = 11%</p><p>under Gallus (201-204) 26 types</p><p>6x NIKOPOLEITWN = 23%</p><p>3x NEIKOPO.. = 11.5%</p><p><br /></p><p>3) Caracalla (198-217) 160 sign. coins (with EI 4.4%)</p><p>under Tertullus(198-201) 31 types</p><p>always NIKOPOLITWN</p><p>under Gallus (201-204) 83 types</p><p>3x NIKOPOLEITWN = 3.6%</p><p>3x NEIKOPO... = 3.6%</p><p>under Ulpianus (210-213) 46 types</p><p>1x NIKOPOLEIT = 2.2%</p><p><br /></p><p>4) Plautilla (202-205) 40 sign. coins (with EI 25%)</p><p>all under Gallus (201-204) 40 types</p><p>7x NIKOPOLEITWN = 17.5%</p><p>3x NEIKOPO... = 7.5%</p><p><br /></p><p>5) Geta (209-212) 62 sign. coins (with EI 3.2%)</p><p>under Gallus 11 types</p><p>1x NEIKOPO... = 9.1%</p><p>under Ulpianus 51 types</p><p>1x NEIKOPO... = 2%</p><p><br /></p><p>6) Macrinus (217-218) 234 sign. coins (with EI 33.3%)</p><p>under Agrippa (217-218) 65 types</p><p>3x MAKREINOC = 4.6%</p><p>under Longinus (217-218) 154 types</p><p>65x MAKREINOC = 42.2%</p><p>3x NIKOPOLITWN = 1.9%</p><p>under Pontianus (217-218) 15 types</p><p>7x NEIKOPOLITWN = 46.7%</p><p><br /></p><p>7) Diadumenian (217-218) 165 sign. coins (with EI 2.4%)</p><p>under Agrippa (217-218) 71 types</p><p>always NIKOPOLITWN</p><p>under Longinus 94 types</p><p>4x NIKOPOLEITWN = 4.3%</p><p><br /></p><p>8) Elagabal (218-222) 277 sign. coins (with EI 3.2%)</p><p>all under Rufus (218-222) 277 types</p><p>9x NIKOPOLEITWN = 3.2%</p><p><br /></p><p>9) Severus Alexander (222-235): no coins minted</p><p><br /></p><p>10) Gordian III (238-244) 97 sign. coins (with Ei = 100%)</p><p>all under under Modestus (241-244)</p><p>always NIKOPOLEITWN = 100%</p><p>1x EICTRO = 1%</p><p><br /></p><p>Looking at the list you can't make out a trend. It depends on the individual governor. Gallus often hase used EI. Therefore the high rate for Domna. Longinus has often used EI. Therefore the high rate for Macrinus. The name of Diadumenian missed an I that could be Greek EI. And at the end Modestus attracts attention because he always writes NIKOPOLEITWN. Wether this writing has become prevalent I don't know, because after Gordian III the mint in Nikopolis was closed. And I'm not familiar with Latin inscriptions found in Nikopolis thereafter.</p><p><br /></p><p>Best regards[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Jochen1, post: 3351099, member: 103829"]You have asked for the early 3rd century. Here I have listed the coins from Severus (193-211) until Gordian III (238-244). Thereafter the mint was closed. Referring to Hristova/Hoeft/Jekov (2018) in this time 2561 different types were issued. I focus on signed coins (with the name of the governor on it), that makes 1341 types altogether: Severus 271 Domna 35 Caracalla 160 Plautilla 40 Geta 62 Macrinus 234 Diadumenia 165 Elagabal 277 Gordian III 97 [B] [/B] 1) Severus (193-211) 271 sign. coins (with EI 6.3%) under Auspex (193-195) 21 types 1x NIKOPOLEITWN = 4.8% under Gentianus (195-198) 15 types always NIKOPOLITWN under Tertullus (198-201) 52 types 1x NIKOPOLEITWN = 1.9% under Gallus (201-204) 168 types 11x NIKOPOLEITWN = 6.5% 4x NEIKOPO = 2.4% under Ulpianus (210-213) 15 types always NIKOPOLITWN 2) Domna (193-211) 35 sign. coins (with EI 28.6%) under Tertullus (198-201) 9 types 1x NIKOPOLEITWN = 11% under Gallus (201-204) 26 types 6x NIKOPOLEITWN = 23% 3x NEIKOPO.. = 11.5% 3) Caracalla (198-217) 160 sign. coins (with EI 4.4%) under Tertullus(198-201) 31 types always NIKOPOLITWN under Gallus (201-204) 83 types 3x NIKOPOLEITWN = 3.6% 3x NEIKOPO... = 3.6% under Ulpianus (210-213) 46 types 1x NIKOPOLEIT = 2.2% 4) Plautilla (202-205) 40 sign. coins (with EI 25%) all under Gallus (201-204) 40 types 7x NIKOPOLEITWN = 17.5% 3x NEIKOPO... = 7.5% 5) Geta (209-212) 62 sign. coins (with EI 3.2%) under Gallus 11 types 1x NEIKOPO... = 9.1% under Ulpianus 51 types 1x NEIKOPO... = 2% 6) Macrinus (217-218) 234 sign. coins (with EI 33.3%) under Agrippa (217-218) 65 types 3x MAKREINOC = 4.6% under Longinus (217-218) 154 types 65x MAKREINOC = 42.2% 3x NIKOPOLITWN = 1.9% under Pontianus (217-218) 15 types 7x NEIKOPOLITWN = 46.7% 7) Diadumenian (217-218) 165 sign. coins (with EI 2.4%) under Agrippa (217-218) 71 types always NIKOPOLITWN under Longinus 94 types 4x NIKOPOLEITWN = 4.3% 8) Elagabal (218-222) 277 sign. coins (with EI 3.2%) all under Rufus (218-222) 277 types 9x NIKOPOLEITWN = 3.2% 9) Severus Alexander (222-235): no coins minted 10) Gordian III (238-244) 97 sign. coins (with Ei = 100%) all under under Modestus (241-244) always NIKOPOLEITWN = 100% 1x EICTRO = 1% Looking at the list you can't make out a trend. It depends on the individual governor. Gallus often hase used EI. Therefore the high rate for Domna. Longinus has often used EI. Therefore the high rate for Macrinus. The name of Diadumenian missed an I that could be Greek EI. And at the end Modestus attracts attention because he always writes NIKOPOLEITWN. Wether this writing has become prevalent I don't know, because after Gordian III the mint in Nikopolis was closed. And I'm not familiar with Latin inscriptions found in Nikopolis thereafter. Best regards[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The strange EIOVΛI
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...