Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The SPQR mint
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="seth77, post: 8213818, member: 56653"]I think that now the generally accepted theory is that the early types (late Gallienus ca. first half of 268 to early Claudius II last few months of 268, perhaps even as late as January 269) were struck at Smyrna, while in 269 the operation moved to Cyzicus. For this possible attribution and chronology argues P. Gysen - A propos des ateliers de Smyrne et de Cyzique que sous Claude II le Gothique' CENB 36, no. 2 (1999), pp. 29-41 and J. Mairat - L'ouverture de l'atelier imperial de Cyzique sous le regne de Claude II le Gothique RN (2007), and it is used by Mairat & Estiot on the online version of RIC V. Before that, authors that dealt with Eastern coinage from Gallienus, like K.J.J. Elks - The Eastern Mints of Valerian and Gallienus: The Evidence of Two New Hoards from Western Turkey (NC 15 1975 pp. 91-109), assigned it to Cyzicus (together with many other issues like the VIIC and PXV and 'Asian mint' coins). But from Cyzicus are now known provincial issues for both Gallienus and Claudius II.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="seth77, post: 8213818, member: 56653"]I think that now the generally accepted theory is that the early types (late Gallienus ca. first half of 268 to early Claudius II last few months of 268, perhaps even as late as January 269) were struck at Smyrna, while in 269 the operation moved to Cyzicus. For this possible attribution and chronology argues P. Gysen - A propos des ateliers de Smyrne et de Cyzique que sous Claude II le Gothique' CENB 36, no. 2 (1999), pp. 29-41 and J. Mairat - L'ouverture de l'atelier imperial de Cyzique sous le regne de Claude II le Gothique RN (2007), and it is used by Mairat & Estiot on the online version of RIC V. Before that, authors that dealt with Eastern coinage from Gallienus, like K.J.J. Elks - The Eastern Mints of Valerian and Gallienus: The Evidence of Two New Hoards from Western Turkey (NC 15 1975 pp. 91-109), assigned it to Cyzicus (together with many other issues like the VIIC and PXV and 'Asian mint' coins). But from Cyzicus are now known provincial issues for both Gallienus and Claudius II.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The SPQR mint
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...