Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;RonSanderson, post: 3235105, member: 77413&quot;]Thanks for the clarification! Truly! They had already removed it and put it aside for me, so I erroneously believed it was in the soft packs. Nonetheless the rest still applies - it is verifiably not AT because it sat in its original packaging until they opened it.</p><p><br /></p><p>I can easily concede that they may not predict the properties of any other issue. The surface itself differs from the smooth Proof and the rough business strike. Maybe that affects how deposits form on the surface.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in