Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;seth77, post: 4848418, member: 56653&quot;]The weight was actually stated, what I did not expect was the wide and medallic flan. Not even the siliquae from the 330s and 340s were this large. Yours is also nice and you might sell it short by saying it&#039;s not historically interesting: the continuation of the tricennalia issue on the reduced siliquae very likely coincides with Constantius II being at Sirmium starting with 357. Considering that during the later years to 360 the legend changes to a quintricennalia dedication (XXXV), yours is about 357.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1170727[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in