Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The Sacred Character of Gold
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Hrefn, post: 7338986, member: 115171"]The Lombards appear to have shared the apparent reluctance to coin in gold, but they got over it. The following solidi and tremisses illustrate this. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1281023[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]1281024[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The first coin is a Lombardic solidus of Romuald II the Duke of Beneventum from 706 to 731. Although he had the temerity to add his initial to the the reverse field, the coin is otherwise in the name and with the portrait of Emperor Justinian II as shown below on the right, which is the true Byzantine issue. (The coin on the left is the younger bust of Justinian II.) You can see it is a close approximation, although Romuald’s solidi had a lower gold content averaging 72%.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1281025[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]1281026[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The following two tremisses were issued by Grimoald III less than a century later.</p><p>Both now feature the name and the portrait of the Duke, with no nod toward Constantinople. The reverse of the first (788-792AD) names Dominus Carolus Rex, referring to Charlemagne. The second was struck after the Beneventans had thrown off Carolingian overlordship (792-806AD) and Charlemagne’s name has been removed. </p><p>The last solidus was struck by Sicard (832-839AD) and again no other suzerainty is acknowledged. I believe he was the last Duke of Beneventum to strike gold coins. </p><p><br /></p><p>The Normans in Sicily also struck gold before the Conquest of Constantinople in 1204.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1281033[/ATTACH]</p><p>The coin on the left is a tari of Roger II 1130-1154AD. (The other is a Venetian ducat which came after the conquest.)</p><p><br /></p><p>As I recall, Charlemagne struck some rare gold; sadly the Hrefn collection lacks any examples. And the crusader states struck dinars although initially these were close copies of the Islamic coins. Here’s a couple (with a later electrum ducat.)</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1281034[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>There are also Anglo Saxon Thrymsas. I am sure others can think of more pre-1204 gold. </p><p>But as a generalization, it is true that gold coin distinct from the Empire, East and West, is uncommon.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Hrefn, post: 7338986, member: 115171"]The Lombards appear to have shared the apparent reluctance to coin in gold, but they got over it. The following solidi and tremisses illustrate this. [ATTACH=full]1281023[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]1281024[/ATTACH] The first coin is a Lombardic solidus of Romuald II the Duke of Beneventum from 706 to 731. Although he had the temerity to add his initial to the the reverse field, the coin is otherwise in the name and with the portrait of Emperor Justinian II as shown below on the right, which is the true Byzantine issue. (The coin on the left is the younger bust of Justinian II.) You can see it is a close approximation, although Romuald’s solidi had a lower gold content averaging 72%. [ATTACH=full]1281025[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]1281026[/ATTACH] The following two tremisses were issued by Grimoald III less than a century later. Both now feature the name and the portrait of the Duke, with no nod toward Constantinople. The reverse of the first (788-792AD) names Dominus Carolus Rex, referring to Charlemagne. The second was struck after the Beneventans had thrown off Carolingian overlordship (792-806AD) and Charlemagne’s name has been removed. The last solidus was struck by Sicard (832-839AD) and again no other suzerainty is acknowledged. I believe he was the last Duke of Beneventum to strike gold coins. The Normans in Sicily also struck gold before the Conquest of Constantinople in 1204. [ATTACH=full]1281033[/ATTACH] The coin on the left is a tari of Roger II 1130-1154AD. (The other is a Venetian ducat which came after the conquest.) As I recall, Charlemagne struck some rare gold; sadly the Hrefn collection lacks any examples. And the crusader states struck dinars although initially these were close copies of the Islamic coins. Here’s a couple (with a later electrum ducat.) [ATTACH=full]1281034[/ATTACH] There are also Anglo Saxon Thrymsas. I am sure others can think of more pre-1204 gold. But as a generalization, it is true that gold coin distinct from the Empire, East and West, is uncommon.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The Sacred Character of Gold
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...