Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;LostDutchman, post: 1319485, member: 16994&quot;]Many many genuine errors have defects on both sides... below is an example I found in less then a minute on EBay. Is this post mint damage? Definitely not.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]149599.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]149600.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>And another...</p><p>[ATTACH]149601.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]149602.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Are their cases where genuine errors are one sided... sure. </p><p><br /></p><p>But to make the statement &quot;<b><i><font size="1">damage on one side and you look at the other side and&nbsp; it is damaged also then you can rest assured in most cases it is post&nbsp; mint damage&quot;</font></i></b> This simply isn&#039;t true. </p><p><br /></p><p>Just as much at the statement &quot;<b><i><font size="1">If you find a unusal looking coin on one side and&nbsp; the other side is absolutely undamaged this means that the coin was&nbsp; mostlikely still resting on a die then you may have found a real mint&nbsp; made error coin&quot;</font></i></b> Isn&#039;t true nearly enough times to make that statement either.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have seen a hundred vice jobs like DT made earlier in this thread that were definitely man made with absolutely NO defect on the opposing side.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in