Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1580929, member: 26302&quot;]I know I am late to this thread, but Good Lord. </p><p><br /></p><p>That stupid coin is simply a fresh coin put into a 1960&#039;s half dollar board. For anyone to pay premiums for something as bloody common, (and one sided which I have always thought was ugly), toning like this blows my mind. What is next, huge dollars for toned 1964 quarters? Seriously, I have a ton of both of these coins in tubes. Who wants one for big money, I am sure we can work it out. </p><p><br /></p><p>Dang, I know I have held my tongue lately on toning prices, but anyone stupid enough to spend big money on toned 1964 coinage, probably the very most common toned coins in existence, deserve to eat the huges losses they will have to eat when this craziness is over.</p><p><br /></p><p>Exceedingly common coin worth basically melt.</p><p><br /></p><p>I know, &quot;but Chris, how do you REALLY feel about it?&quot; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Edit: I posted this before I saw you talked about listing a 64 Paul. This tirade was not directed at you or your coin.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in