Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
The Problem of Small Change - Was George III Responsible?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="The Eidolon, post: 8249577, member: 102103"]Thomas J. Sargent's "The Big Problem of Small Change" has a lot of useful theoretical discussion as to the shortages of minor coinage in Medieval and Early Modern coinage. Some of the math and economic theory went over my head, but if I got the gist of it, the main argument went something like:</p><p><br /></p><p>Small change is more useful than larger money in allowing transactions to take place. To use a modern example, almost anything you can buy with a dollar you could also buy with 4 quarters. But unless change is readily available, there are lots of things you could buy with 4 quarters which you can't buy with a dollar.</p><p><br /></p><p>Even when all the currency units are made of the same metal (such as silver in the Medieval Era), small change still tends to be inherently in short supply. In addition, smaller money had a higher cost of production per unit value than larger coins, so governments were reluctant to produce it in adequate quantities. Governments tried to solve the problem by debasing the minor coinage, but that just led to inflation and a change in the value ratio of minor to major coinage.</p><p><br /></p><p>The problem was only really resolved when technology improved enough to issue "token" coinage which didn't need to contain its full metal value. Modern milled coinage allowed for circulating copper and less than full-bodied silver without the rampant counterfeiting that previously occurred. </p><p><br /></p><p>The UK especially exacerbated the problem by 1) not having copper coinage be legal tender which could be freely exchanged for silver; 2) not addressing the silver:gold price ratio to keep silver in circulation in the late 1700s; and 3) suspending the convertibility of paper money during the French Revolution/Napoleonic Era.</p><p><br /></p><p>China's "cash" system of full-bodied copper coinage is also an interesting example. As far as I know copper traded with silver ingot-based money at what was effectively a floating exchange rate, which solved some problems but caused a a bunch of others. Larger-denominated copper coins were highly inflationary.</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, here's my "full bodied" copper coinage: Sweden 4 daler 1756 (1.93 kg)</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1453034[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="The Eidolon, post: 8249577, member: 102103"]Thomas J. Sargent's "The Big Problem of Small Change" has a lot of useful theoretical discussion as to the shortages of minor coinage in Medieval and Early Modern coinage. Some of the math and economic theory went over my head, but if I got the gist of it, the main argument went something like: Small change is more useful than larger money in allowing transactions to take place. To use a modern example, almost anything you can buy with a dollar you could also buy with 4 quarters. But unless change is readily available, there are lots of things you could buy with 4 quarters which you can't buy with a dollar. Even when all the currency units are made of the same metal (such as silver in the Medieval Era), small change still tends to be inherently in short supply. In addition, smaller money had a higher cost of production per unit value than larger coins, so governments were reluctant to produce it in adequate quantities. Governments tried to solve the problem by debasing the minor coinage, but that just led to inflation and a change in the value ratio of minor to major coinage. The problem was only really resolved when technology improved enough to issue "token" coinage which didn't need to contain its full metal value. Modern milled coinage allowed for circulating copper and less than full-bodied silver without the rampant counterfeiting that previously occurred. The UK especially exacerbated the problem by 1) not having copper coinage be legal tender which could be freely exchanged for silver; 2) not addressing the silver:gold price ratio to keep silver in circulation in the late 1700s; and 3) suspending the convertibility of paper money during the French Revolution/Napoleonic Era. China's "cash" system of full-bodied copper coinage is also an interesting example. As far as I know copper traded with silver ingot-based money at what was effectively a floating exchange rate, which solved some problems but caused a a bunch of others. Larger-denominated copper coins were highly inflationary. Anyway, here's my "full bodied" copper coinage: Sweden 4 daler 1756 (1.93 kg) [ATTACH=full]1453034[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
The Problem of Small Change - Was George III Responsible?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...