Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;desertgem, post: 961723, member: 15199&quot;]Please correct me if I have misunderstood the PCGS case. I am under the impression that the &quot;doctoring&quot; that is the case point was all were physical alterations and was significant because PCGS had evidence ( photos,or&nbsp; laser &quot;fingerprint&quot;, etc.) that showed that each coin was different from a &quot;preceding&quot; slabbing condition of said coin, thus indicating that a fraudulent change had occurred, and the submitters of this last time submission violated the &quot;contract&quot; not to submit altered coins? </p><p><br /></p><p>If this is close, this physical alteration could not occur from environmental factors and would have to directly performed by a person or person operating a machine/device. It is pretty cut and dried. To try and do the same with toning which can occur from environmental factors or the same factors applied by a human, it is far from such. IMO.</p><p><br /></p><p>jim[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in