Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 2930519, member: 37839&quot;]Gotcha.&nbsp; I think we are more on track.&nbsp; What I was getting at was inconsistency in grading, not necessarily in gross grading (is it MS or not.), but subtle differences in coins that could go either way, and if not outright market grading, then grading that is not nailing the finer points of coin grading.&nbsp; My point was that all three were so close that they should have been identically graded.&nbsp; They weren’t, and while it isn’t as catastrophic as the AU 58 versus MS 63 slider situation, it is kind of bizarre.&nbsp; In hand, the 3 are so close that I could not give them different grades.&nbsp; As far as what they deserve, I am sure that there will be a difference of opinion.&nbsp; I would have gone MS 65 PL for all 3, but that is, of course, open to dispute.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in