Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;vavet, post: 400363, member: 11630&quot;]Do you really expect posters to believe that David Hall and his comrades would take the fall for what the ANA did? It wasn&#039;t the ANA standards that were the problem, it was how they were applied by the con artists. If a coin was nicer than 60, they called it 65 and that was the problem. The 63 grade didn&#039;t start getting widely used until 1980 and the 64 grade in 1985. No offense GD, but you are the one who doesn&#039;t get it.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Thanks to PCGS and their ilk, the ANA doesn&#039;t even have standards anymore. They gave up and now only &quot;report&quot; what the market manipulators are doing.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in