Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The Optimum Mercury Dime Type Coin Year/MM
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="mark_h, post: 965271, member: 3726"]Not a type coin collector and maybe I should not answer, but you ask for opinions and I can always come up with one of those. Of the four coins listed I am going to assume the coins posted contain typical strike characteristics for the dates and the grade. I did not consider price or population. I think the 20 shows a better strike than the other 3 coins display. I think I see more and stronger details on the obverse and reverse. Could just be the toning but I don't think so - the strike seems more crisp to me. Now having said that I don't think that means you can not find equally well struck coins in other dates(not a mercury expert). At the same time maybe the coins posted besides the 20 are great strikes from the dies they used, but I think the 20 shows the design as intended better. My opinion only and I think I eliminated the toning as part of the consideration - or otherwise I would automatically have eliminate the last two because I just don't like the toning on those two. I tried to just look at design elements and how strong they looked in the picture.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now when I think of the optimum grade for a coin in a series - I think of it as usually meaning well struck examples are readily available in some grade for a specific date. I guess I don't usually think of them as having a population of 2. Never really thought about it a whole lot. But just my humble opinion on a sleepless night.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="mark_h, post: 965271, member: 3726"]Not a type coin collector and maybe I should not answer, but you ask for opinions and I can always come up with one of those. Of the four coins listed I am going to assume the coins posted contain typical strike characteristics for the dates and the grade. I did not consider price or population. I think the 20 shows a better strike than the other 3 coins display. I think I see more and stronger details on the obverse and reverse. Could just be the toning but I don't think so - the strike seems more crisp to me. Now having said that I don't think that means you can not find equally well struck coins in other dates(not a mercury expert). At the same time maybe the coins posted besides the 20 are great strikes from the dies they used, but I think the 20 shows the design as intended better. My opinion only and I think I eliminated the toning as part of the consideration - or otherwise I would automatically have eliminate the last two because I just don't like the toning on those two. I tried to just look at design elements and how strong they looked in the picture. Now when I think of the optimum grade for a coin in a series - I think of it as usually meaning well struck examples are readily available in some grade for a specific date. I guess I don't usually think of them as having a population of 2. Never really thought about it a whole lot. But just my humble opinion on a sleepless night.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The Optimum Mercury Dime Type Coin Year/MM
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...