Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;redwin117, post: 1537740, member: 21438&quot;]you would find some way to mention your lousy coin 150 times in 20 pages or&nbsp; less.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p>Read more: <a href="http://www.cointalk.com/t214119/#ixzz27Ikvq1pq" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.cointalk.com/t214119/#ixzz27Ikvq1pq">http://www.cointalk.com/t214119/#ixzz27Ikvq1pq</a>&nbsp; <span style="color: #000000">Is this a LOUSY COIN ? certified at Baltimore Coin Show in MARYLAND on March 2000 by Mr. ALAN HAGER of Accugrade. Just to reminds you there&#039;s a lot of coin dealer and other peoples out there when it was certified it. A very large Crowd. I do not know what you are thinking or hated about this coin. I just simply wonder on the comments of Don Willis President of PCGS while they have a COIN FACT ENCYCLOPEDIA/PCGS: Double Denomination is The Most Expensive/Popular. Just wonder. Okey I will attached again the picture for comparison between the Two. For your INFORMATION my COIN is NOT a GARBAGE too.!</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">[ATTACH]204719.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]204720.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]204721.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]204722.vB[/ATTACH] IS THIS COIN LOOK GARBAGE to you. Who is behind the COIN FACT ENCYCLOPEDIA when they choose Double Denomination is the more expensive/popular errors than transitional coin errors. Just asking..</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">Thank you. Have a Great SUNDAY!</span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in