Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;messydesk, post: 3704273, member: 1765&quot;]This is where I differ in why I say 65.&nbsp; The marks are sufficiently hidden and the fields are very clean.&nbsp; The luster just doesn&#039;t seem frosty enough for a higher grade.&nbsp; Take a look at some white 66s (most are toned) and they have more &quot;punch&quot;, even in the assembly line photos, than this one.&nbsp; This 77-S in 66 (no CAC sticker) actually has more contact marks than the subject coin, but makes the 75 look &quot;tired&quot; in comparison, despite having fewer marks.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://dyn1.heritagestatic.com/lf?set=path%5B1%2F1%2F4%2F8%2F2%2F11482553%5D&amp;call=url%5Bfile%3Aproduct.chain%5D" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in