Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Paul M., post: 3704248, member: 73165&quot;]I agree with most of what you said, but I still think this coin is rightly a 66.&nbsp; Every single contact mark is, as you put it &quot;hidden,&quot; and well out of the prime focal areas.&nbsp; I&#039;m not really seeing those spots your referencing on the reverse that bring down the eye appeal.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is what PCGS says a 66 should be:</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I would definitely say this coin meets that standard.&nbsp; This is a very attractive coin with no marks that jump out at you, and nice luster.</p><p><br /></p><p>Based on the price difference from 65 -&gt; 66, I think the submitter got robbed of a couple thousand dollars.&nbsp; If it were in my personal collection, I wouldn&#039;t care, but I think this is a potential crackout candidate, even if it takes 4-5 times to get it into a 66 holder.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in