Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ddddd, post: 3673486, member: 22377&quot;]What’s interesting with those is that CAC found two of them to be solid for the grade (A or B). They for some reason do reward “originality” even if the coin looks unattractive.</p><p><br /></p><p>From the pictures, they look ok as 67s to me but I’d expect them to sell for a discount as the market would take care of the unattractive look. The CAC sticker probably will bump up the price, in part because there are sticker only buyers (and maybe based on CAC bid being higher or CAC supporting the price with its own bid). Still a nice 67 without a sticker will garner more in most cases.</p><p><br /></p><p>With the generic 80-S in 67 going for $400-$500, I think a $300-$400 price would be about right (I didn’t check Heritage, but I’m guessing they brought more). Penalizing the coin to a 66 would drop the value to around $150 (closer to low end price range of 66s). That seems too harsh a penalty for unattractive toning on a technically correct grade.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in