Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 3662212, member: 24314&quot;]Lehigh96, posted:&nbsp; &quot;So you are saying you&#039;ve never seen an ugly clean well struck lustrous coin?&nbsp; I&#039;m sorry I don&#039;t have a better example, but I&#039;m a collector who focuses on eye appeal so my inventory of ugly coins is limited.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/l25Anw8.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #660066"><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie46" alt=":facepalm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> IMO, posting this</span></i> <b><span style="color: #b30000">CORRODED <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie96" alt=":vomit:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> PROBLEM DOG </span></b><i><span style="color: #660066">of a coin with a &quot;MARKET GRADE&quot; does <b>NOT</b> refute what Typecoin wrote</span></i>: &quot;When you grade a coin on surface preservation, luster, and strike, eye appeal naturally falls out. A coin with few marks, good strike and great luster will have exceptional eye appeal, toned or not.&quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in