Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 3656810, member: 24314&quot;]Late to the party again due to a &quot;tag.&quot;&nbsp; I don&#039;t know what coin you are writing about; however,...</p><p><br /></p><p>Morgandude11, posted: &quot;Then your [<i><span style="color: #660066">Doug</span></i>] standards are ludicrous.&nbsp; An obvious gem coin is AU 58, because YOU see wear?&nbsp; [<i><span style="color: #660066">Actually not ludicrous.&nbsp; Friction wear on a coin = AU.&nbsp; Some can see it, some cannot, and most professional graders and successful major dealers who can see it IGNORE IT because of the value of the coin.]&nbsp; </span></i>That is the very definition of bias, and you just don’t comprehend that. [<i><span style="color: #660066">No &quot;bias&quot; is involved as there is <b><span style="color: #ff0000">NO PREDISPOSED POINT OF VIEW (bias).</span></b>&nbsp; Doug just graded the coin as he saw it.&nbsp; BTW, misusing a word is like calling an AU coin MS-68.] </span></i>&nbsp; TPGs <b>may have</b> [<i><span style="color: #660066">May have? MAY HAVE?&nbsp; LOL, coming from you THAT IS WAT&quot;S <span style="color: #663300">ACTUALLY LUDICROUS</span> in your post.] </span></i>changed their standards, but grading what YOU think is an AU coin as MS66?&nbsp; Nah, not a realistic statement.&quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in