Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 3967633, member: 19165&quot;]With 33 guesses, CT called this a 63.6. NGC and CAC called it a 64. </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m actually a bit surprised by the low guesses on this one. To be fair, over half of you got it right. I think this is a high end 64, and honestly questioned why it isn&#039;t 65 when I first saw it. I think the luster is probably what holds it to a 64. Contact marks are minimal, with only a couple of significant marks. There isn&#039;t a lot of disturbance in the fields, either. To me, this looks like a borderline 64/65. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1044235[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in