Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 3909866, member: 19165&quot;]With 43 respondents, CoinTalk guessed almost exactly 66. Unfortunately, PCGS gave this a 67.... Only 37% of guesses got this one right, with the vast majority guessing low. </p><p><br /></p><p>In my opinion, this coin appears to be a solid 67. The luster is quite strong. The strike is bold. There are almost no marks to mention on the obverse, and just a few on the reverse devices (primarily in out of prime focus areas). Remember, the same mark on the leg of M is much less important than that mark on the torch. I think some people were weighting the importance of the marks a bit too much on this one. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1030542[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in