The Official CoinTalk Grading Experiment 11

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by physics-fan3.14, Sep 28, 2019.

?

What does the Coin grade?

  1. AU-55

  2. AU-58

  3. MS-60

  4. MS-61

  5. MS-62

  6. MS-63

  7. MS-64

  8. MS-65

  9. MS-66

  10. MS-67

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Patrick King

    Patrick King Well-Known Member

    Im guessing this coin is in a 65 holder.
    It looks over dipped and the obverse luster does not match the reverse so I would not pay more than 64 money for it.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    I reckon it's a 63. Dipped out, chattery, pretty good luster, although the reverse pic makes the luster look flawed like an AU. Curious about this one...
     
  4. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Baggy especially the mark on the cheek. Dipped but still good luster. Not a coin I’d buy as I don’t like white coins. 63 my call
     
  5. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

    I'm going with MS64, I believe that the Mark's on the cheek keep it from 65. It might have been dipped, but it probably got a numerical grade.
     
  6. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Alright, time to wrap this one up. NGC and CAC called it 64, the CoinTalk average was 63.07, with 27 votes. It seems the group struggled a little bit with this one.

    gtg 11 obv - Copy.jpg
     
    C-B-D and longshot like this.
  7. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    Keeping the streak alive! Not crazy about the coin, but I'm thinking the luster is much better than what we infer from these pictures. The photo setup is the same whether they're doing dimes or dollars, and the "size" of the light relative to the coin is much larger with a dime, which gives slightly more diffuse looking (i.e., "dipped-out" looking) luster compared with that on a dollar.
     
  8. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    Dang it, I missed this one. My first thought was honestly "MS-NOPE!", but, ultimately I landed at 63.
     
    Sunflower_Coins likes this.
  9. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    D976C0C6-88E9-4960-8438-28F486186572.jpeg 11AE5E1F-9675-4932-9500-B0018E9A110F.jpeg 284CCB3D-1AC4-41EB-810B-C88968C10FC3.jpeg Had plenty of 64 cac barber dimes. This coin doesn’t compare give you a couple examples
     
  10. dividebytube

    dividebytube Active Member

    It's not a coin I would buy based on the (lack of) toning - looks dipped as others said - but I can understand the grading level.
     
    Johndoe2000$ likes this.
  11. Johndoe2000$

    Johndoe2000$ Well-Known Member

    Even given the poor lighting set up which makes the coin look washed out, and dull, it still seems to me that it's a stretch to call this a 64. I know NGC, and CAC don't agree with this. Perhaps in hand it may change some opinions ???
    But hey, I'm not too familiar with Barber coinage, (Not my cup of tea) and only a casual collector. Who's learning, while not losing money doing it. :)
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2019
  12. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    Sharp looking coin. I say MS64 due to what look like pretty significant marks on Liberty’s cheek and chin. As well as a large mark between UNITED and STATES.
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2019
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page