Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 3636260, member: 112&quot;]I&#039;m all too well aware of what you&#039;re saying, and I agree with it. I review coins for people in Heritage auctions on just about a daily basis - and always have. But I&#039;ll give a little tip that many find helpful when viewing Heritage coins. It&#039;s typically the blowup pics that they use that have luster limiting effect. Quite often, far more often than not actually, if you look at the full slab pics you get a much better idea of the luster the coin actually has, or does not have.</p><p><br /></p><p>All of that said, I simply don&#039;t think it&#039;s the case with this particular coin. What I believe to be true is what I wrote above. The coin has obviously been dipped, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s even debatable. And I believe it was the dipping, and or previous toning, or a combination of both, that partially destroyed the luster on that coin making it look the way it looks in the pics provided.</p><p><br /></p><p>If ya saw it in hand, I&#039;m reasonably certain it would look pretty much like it looks in those pics.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in