Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The Official CoinTalk Grading Experiment 1
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 3634743, member: 112"]I'm sure not. Nor do I think others are either.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Reasonably certain that's not what is going one. Even what you call a thick skinned coin can have high quality luster. But the simple fact is - this coin does not, it has low quality luster. And there's a good reason for it if you look at it closely. Either the previous toning had already partially destroyed the luster, or the coin was dipped a tiny bit too long. In either case the end result is low quality luster.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Both statements are echoing the same sentiment, the same philosophy if ya will - that there should not be limiting factors when grading a coin. Now I'll grant you, there are those who hold that opinion. But limiting factors is what makes grading standards - grading standards to begin with. Limiting factors are the very essence of grading and they always have been. If you do not have limiting factors then there are no standards. </p><p><br /></p><p>With every grade there is from the very bottom to the very top it is limiting factors that distinguish one grade from the next - in either direction. Start ignoring limiting factors and you have just eliminated grading standards.</p><p><br /></p><p>A heavy, large, significant, (use the adjective of your choice if you wish), contact mark in a prime focal area prevents any coin from being worthy of a gem grade, (and that's defined as anything higher than 64), just like any contact mark prevents a coin from being graded as 70. There is no difference. Any limiting factor prevents any coin from being graded as a 70. So you cannot chose to ignore a limiting factor with a given grade, and not ignore it with another grade. </p><p><br /></p><p>If you do that then there are no standards anymore.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 3634743, member: 112"]I'm sure not. Nor do I think others are either. Reasonably certain that's not what is going one. Even what you call a thick skinned coin can have high quality luster. But the simple fact is - this coin does not, it has low quality luster. And there's a good reason for it if you look at it closely. Either the previous toning had already partially destroyed the luster, or the coin was dipped a tiny bit too long. In either case the end result is low quality luster. Both statements are echoing the same sentiment, the same philosophy if ya will - that there should not be limiting factors when grading a coin. Now I'll grant you, there are those who hold that opinion. But limiting factors is what makes grading standards - grading standards to begin with. Limiting factors are the very essence of grading and they always have been. If you do not have limiting factors then there are no standards. With every grade there is from the very bottom to the very top it is limiting factors that distinguish one grade from the next - in either direction. Start ignoring limiting factors and you have just eliminated grading standards. A heavy, large, significant, (use the adjective of your choice if you wish), contact mark in a prime focal area prevents any coin from being worthy of a gem grade, (and that's defined as anything higher than 64), just like any contact mark prevents a coin from being graded as 70. There is no difference. Any limiting factor prevents any coin from being graded as a 70. So you cannot chose to ignore a limiting factor with a given grade, and not ignore it with another grade. If you do that then there are no standards anymore.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The Official CoinTalk Grading Experiment 1
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...