Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;TypeCoin971793, post: 3349210, member: 78244&quot;]PCGS VF-20. Obviously cleaned, but not net graded at all.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]886777[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]886778[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]886779[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]886780[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS XF-40. Nice original XF-45/AU-50 which was net-graded downward due to severe damage on the obverse (neck area).</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]886781[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]886782[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]886783[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]886784[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>And this one was (properly) graded F details cleaned when I sent it in.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]886792[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]886793[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>These are all the same coin type, and they are all in the same generation of PCGS holders. If PCGS would pick a standard and stick with it, than I would be more willing to accept their grading practices regarding “problem” coins and net grading. But having three completely different standards is unacceptable.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in