Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The NGC "T" & "W" Designations--The Lost Designations
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="brg5658, post: 1472902, member: 29751"]I was away for the weekend, and I just got back. I took a few new pictures of some of the W/T holdered NGC coins in my collection.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b>1944-D Jefferson Nickel, graded MS67T, NGC Generation 8 holder</b>: This is actually my favorite Jefferson Nickel in my collection. The cheek is about as clean as you can get, and I love the hints of champagne toning. All the more cool was the holder. This one will remain in my collection for a long time as my War Nickel type coin.</p><p>[ATTACH]185378.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>1954 Washington Quarter, graded MS65T, NGC Generation 8 holder</b>: This coin is an example of the difference between how the "T" designation was applied as opposed to the ★ designation -- not all toning is "eye appealing". I snagged this one on the Bay a while back for next to nothing, mostly for the old NGC8 holder and the "T" designation.</p><p>[ATTACH]185379.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b>2000-P Virginia State Quarter, graded MS67★W, generation 7 NGC holder</b>: This is an example of how the "W" designation only applies to the color of the coin when holdered. This quarter now exhibits a golden/champagne tone on both the obverse and reverse, despite the "white" designation. My best guess for the ★ designation assignment on this coin is for the semi-prooflike surfaces.</p><p>[ATTACH]185380.vB[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="brg5658, post: 1472902, member: 29751"]I was away for the weekend, and I just got back. I took a few new pictures of some of the W/T holdered NGC coins in my collection. [B]1944-D Jefferson Nickel, graded MS67T, NGC Generation 8 holder[/B]: This is actually my favorite Jefferson Nickel in my collection. The cheek is about as clean as you can get, and I love the hints of champagne toning. All the more cool was the holder. This one will remain in my collection for a long time as my War Nickel type coin. [ATTACH]185378.vB[/ATTACH] [B] 1954 Washington Quarter, graded MS65T, NGC Generation 8 holder[/B]: This coin is an example of the difference between how the "T" designation was applied as opposed to the ★ designation -- not all toning is "eye appealing". I snagged this one on the Bay a while back for next to nothing, mostly for the old NGC8 holder and the "T" designation. [ATTACH]185379.vB[/ATTACH] [B]2000-P Virginia State Quarter, graded MS67★W, generation 7 NGC holder[/B]: This is an example of how the "W" designation only applies to the color of the coin when holdered. This quarter now exhibits a golden/champagne tone on both the obverse and reverse, despite the "white" designation. My best guess for the ★ designation assignment on this coin is for the semi-prooflike surfaces. [ATTACH]185380.vB[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The NGC "T" & "W" Designations--The Lost Designations
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...