Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;baseball21, post: 7558064, member: 76863&quot;]That&#039;s dumb to me too.&nbsp; Either count them or don&#039;t.&nbsp; Either allow them or don&#039;t.&nbsp; The more they try and walk the line the more it just shows what a bad position they have really put themselves in.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>They really probably should just break off a new category where it has to be all NGC for monetary prizes and just leave the current ones alone counting everything for full points </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m a big fan of CAC, but that doesn&#039;t mean giving them more points over their standard score isn&#039;t a bad look for a brand.&nbsp; This is especially true since the NGC set users are more likely to be anti-cac.</p><p><br /></p><p>Granted this may be an attempt to slow down how many NGC CAC get crossed over to PCGS CAC but at least to me I think this will end up back firing.&nbsp; This does prop up CAC more (no argument against that) but generally PCGS CAC sells for more than NGC CAC and inadvertently props up PCGS </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>And NGC is generally more lenient on high grades for the grade itself.&nbsp; For Franklins it doesn&#039;t really matter if the bottom line is full the middle is as well essentially every time.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in