Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The new guy
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 1905904, member: 15309"]The new guys anger towards Joe made it appear that he was the buyer of the coin. E-Bay sellers don't mind the SNAD rule; but they hate the fact that E-Bay's application of the SNAD rule almost always sides with the buyer regardless of facts. In this case, do you think that Joe misrepresented the coin in any way?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>As you have pointed out, volatility does not just exist in the collectibles market. Please name me another investment market where you get to return your investment purchase for full value if the price drops?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>What is "true" value? You make the assumption that the value of the coin will drop in the future as a statement of fact. What if the value actually increased? Should the seller be able to require the buyer to have to return the item for 30 days because the value increased and he has seller's remorse?</p><p><br /></p><p>If you decided that the coin was a SNAD within the established return window then I agree that you shouldn't have to keep the coin. But apparently you had time to get the coin graded, which takes over 1 month, and still file a successful SNAD case. You purchased a raw coin, not a certified coin with a grade guarantee. Grading is subjective. Simply because the TPG's opinion of the coin claims the coined was cleaned, what makes their opinion infallible and more reliable than the seller's grading opinion? There have been very recent threads on Cointalk showing that NGC is grading coins as cleaned that show no evidence of cleaning. How much time expired before you filed a SNAD case on that 1862 IHC?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>It is your position that every item that is sold on E-Bay is entitled to a 30-day unconditional return policy regardless if the item is Significantly Not As Described or not. There needs to be a balance between buying and selling on E-Bay. Without that balance, sellers will exit stage left. How many times have you seen a member of this forum or another forum state that they will no longer sell on E-Bay precisely because of the imbalance on E-Bay that strongly favors the buyer? Your proposal is to exacerbate that situation even further for no other reason than to serve your own personal desires.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The smudge was bogus and it should matter. The buyer got EXACTLY what was described in the listing and the smudge was visible in the photograph. The only reason that buyer should be able to return the coin is because Joe made a mistake and offered a 14 day return. Had Joe listed the item with "No Returns" he should not be forced to issue a refund to a guy gambling in an investment market.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is a difference between a consumer and an investor. That is why E-Bay does not require return policies on bullion items which experience daily fluctuations in value. What you are proposing is an incredibly unfair advantage to buyers of investment collectibles.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for the new guy, your hope that he wasn't banned is tantamount to rubbernecking. The guy caused a community disruption immediately and insulted the owner of the forum. It may have been entertaining, but it is not something I would like to see repeated over and over again.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 1905904, member: 15309"]The new guys anger towards Joe made it appear that he was the buyer of the coin. E-Bay sellers don't mind the SNAD rule; but they hate the fact that E-Bay's application of the SNAD rule almost always sides with the buyer regardless of facts. In this case, do you think that Joe misrepresented the coin in any way? As you have pointed out, volatility does not just exist in the collectibles market. Please name me another investment market where you get to return your investment purchase for full value if the price drops? What is "true" value? You make the assumption that the value of the coin will drop in the future as a statement of fact. What if the value actually increased? Should the seller be able to require the buyer to have to return the item for 30 days because the value increased and he has seller's remorse? If you decided that the coin was a SNAD within the established return window then I agree that you shouldn't have to keep the coin. But apparently you had time to get the coin graded, which takes over 1 month, and still file a successful SNAD case. You purchased a raw coin, not a certified coin with a grade guarantee. Grading is subjective. Simply because the TPG's opinion of the coin claims the coined was cleaned, what makes their opinion infallible and more reliable than the seller's grading opinion? There have been very recent threads on Cointalk showing that NGC is grading coins as cleaned that show no evidence of cleaning. How much time expired before you filed a SNAD case on that 1862 IHC? It is your position that every item that is sold on E-Bay is entitled to a 30-day unconditional return policy regardless if the item is Significantly Not As Described or not. There needs to be a balance between buying and selling on E-Bay. Without that balance, sellers will exit stage left. How many times have you seen a member of this forum or another forum state that they will no longer sell on E-Bay precisely because of the imbalance on E-Bay that strongly favors the buyer? Your proposal is to exacerbate that situation even further for no other reason than to serve your own personal desires. The smudge was bogus and it should matter. The buyer got EXACTLY what was described in the listing and the smudge was visible in the photograph. The only reason that buyer should be able to return the coin is because Joe made a mistake and offered a 14 day return. Had Joe listed the item with "No Returns" he should not be forced to issue a refund to a guy gambling in an investment market. There is a difference between a consumer and an investor. That is why E-Bay does not require return policies on bullion items which experience daily fluctuations in value. What you are proposing is an incredibly unfair advantage to buyers of investment collectibles. As for the new guy, your hope that he wasn't banned is tantamount to rubbernecking. The guy caused a community disruption immediately and insulted the owner of the forum. It may have been entertaining, but it is not something I would like to see repeated over and over again.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The new guy
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...