Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The most artistic of the least artistic coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Nap, post: 2977821, member: 73099"]Coinage in Northumbria took a somewhat different course in the early 700s than in the rest of England.</p><p>They were the first kingdom to have a regal inscribed coinage, in the name of Aldfrith (685-705)</p><p>[ATTACH=full]732046[/ATTACH] </p><p>O: +ALDFRIDUS</p><p>R: "fantastic animal" facing left, tri-forked tail</p><p><br /></p><p>Then an odd thing happened, the coinage reverted to anonymous sceattas with no names on the coins, such as this one:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]732047[/ATTACH] </p><p>O: bust facing right, cross</p><p>R: two birds, one walking, one flying, cross</p><p><br /></p><p>This coin dates approximately from the 720s and has no mention of any king at all. It seems odd that this coinage would revert to the abstract sceatta type, once a literate regal type was established (a type that would persist, though later). Hard to believe they are from the same series, but all the currently available data indicates that they were coined in York and from this period.</p><p><br /></p><p>Then in the 740s-750s the inscribed regal sceatta with the fantastic creature was back:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]732048[/ATTACH] </p><p>O: EOTBEREhTVſ.</p><p>R: "fantastic animal" facing left</p><p><br /></p><p>The coinage remained literate, with the king's name upon it until the time of Aelfwald I (780s) or Aethelred I (790s), when moneyers started dropping their names on the reverse of the coins, eliminating the beast.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]732057[/ATTACH] </p><p>O: +AEDILRED (central Rx)</p><p>R: +CEOLBALD</p><p><br /></p><p>Over time, the silver degenerated into base copper/brass. The designs remained simplistic. The beast was then, for whatever reason, briefly revived in the 840s for Aethelred II by Leofthegn as illustrated above. I believe there is only one die known for the creature, so they must have been a very small coinage, with the possibility of some special purpose (presentation, etc) certainly something worth considering.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Nap, post: 2977821, member: 73099"]Coinage in Northumbria took a somewhat different course in the early 700s than in the rest of England. They were the first kingdom to have a regal inscribed coinage, in the name of Aldfrith (685-705) [ATTACH=full]732046[/ATTACH] O: +ALDFRIDUS R: "fantastic animal" facing left, tri-forked tail Then an odd thing happened, the coinage reverted to anonymous sceattas with no names on the coins, such as this one: [ATTACH=full]732047[/ATTACH] O: bust facing right, cross R: two birds, one walking, one flying, cross This coin dates approximately from the 720s and has no mention of any king at all. It seems odd that this coinage would revert to the abstract sceatta type, once a literate regal type was established (a type that would persist, though later). Hard to believe they are from the same series, but all the currently available data indicates that they were coined in York and from this period. Then in the 740s-750s the inscribed regal sceatta with the fantastic creature was back: [ATTACH=full]732048[/ATTACH] O: EOTBEREhTVſ. R: "fantastic animal" facing left The coinage remained literate, with the king's name upon it until the time of Aelfwald I (780s) or Aethelred I (790s), when moneyers started dropping their names on the reverse of the coins, eliminating the beast. [ATTACH=full]732057[/ATTACH] O: +AEDILRED (central Rx) R: +CEOLBALD Over time, the silver degenerated into base copper/brass. The designs remained simplistic. The beast was then, for whatever reason, briefly revived in the 840s for Aethelred II by Leofthegn as illustrated above. I believe there is only one die known for the creature, so they must have been a very small coinage, with the possibility of some special purpose (presentation, etc) certainly something worth considering.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The most artistic of the least artistic coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...