Yes, that is an unusually high grade example. Nice color, and you can see the remnants of the sprue at both top and bottom. Cool piece!
I bet those tin pitis from Indonesia were cast in trees also. I have a few and they are so crummy that I do not bother much about collecting them.
What a fascinating search and find trek, Jason! Thank you for the very informative post. As a world coin type collector, it was an interesting read. You possibly have at least one example of a Palembang tin pitis, a tin alloy Arabic script coin, which was cast in trees. Palembang is one of the oldest Indonesian cities and is located on the island of Sumatra by the Musi River. At one time, Palembang was an independent sultanate, but the Dutch East India Company imposed themselves and Dutch coinage on the locals to secure a profitable spice trade. The existing pitis were generally dumped into the river to make room for the Dutch coinage in the 1820’s, only to be partially recovered recently in hoards by local divers. Frank S. Robinson, a well-known coin dealer, frequently referred to in CT threads, acquired a hoard. He and his assisting colleagues identified nearly 300 varieties, among 19 general types of coins and documented same with photographs, in a small book.
Hi All, A lovely money tree. Although not part of my collection, many years back I picked up a mould for nine 1 Fals coins dated 1241 (1825). The mould seems to be made of brass and is in very worn condition(has had MUCH use). The lettering is almost illegible but can be made out as can the star on the other side. The coins, the tree and the mould all make an interesting story. Stay safe, All the best, Col
I came across these two while cataloging today and thought of this informative thread. Thanks again for posting it @physics-fan3.14 !
Thanks! Point of interest - I believe the first one you have posted is actually C#166.2, minted in Marrakesh. The bottom one is correct, minted in Fes.
Krause has an illustration of each mint name. The mint name is above the date. Compare the two - I think you'll agree that they appear quite different. (fun fact - the full-coin illustration in Krause for 166.2 is actually wrong (it shows another 166.1), but they have illustrated each mint name at the beginning of the section) I personally don't read Arabic, so I can't be 100% sure.... but the two look quite different to me, based on my experience with Moroccan coinage. The script is extremely crude, of course: I wouldn't be surprised if the guy engraving the molds was barely literate. I match shapes and symbols, and the first seems to match Marrakesh much better.
I should've consulted Krause, but I was being lazy. Thanks again, I fixed it and have another variety!