Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Skyman, post: 7891103, member: 28299&quot;][USER=22377]@ddddd[/USER]&nbsp; Thank you for the info!&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Personally, for me to grade a coin as a monster toner, it not only has to have monster toning, it also has to have a high technical grade for the Type and date/mm.</p><p><br /></p><p>1945-S Nickel....1.9....too crusty for my liking</p><p>1963-D Cent....1.9....common coin in common condition</p><p>1965 Cent...5...common coin with nice two sided toning.&nbsp; Technically clean.</p><p>1914-D Cent... 5.3&nbsp; tougher coin, tougher to find with nice toning.&nbsp; PCGS is much tougher on giving higher grades on BN, and the surfaces certainly looking higher than the technical grade.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m going to include two pictures of the more toned side of this SLQ, because you see somewhat different colors depending on how you rotate it for the camera lens.&nbsp; The colors are all there together, it&#039;s just the camera lens doesn&#039;t catch the toning quite as well as the human eye.&nbsp; In an old NGC MS66 slab.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1361668[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1361669[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1361670[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in