The Monster Toned Coin Game Thread

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by ddddd, Jul 15, 2020.

  1. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I just noticed your question and am debating that myself.

    What does everyone think? Stop at 6.0 or go to 6.9 (and have 6.9 be the best of the monster toners)?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    And the floor is open...
     
  4. LuxUnit

    LuxUnit Well-Known Member

    Stop at 6. At a certain point a monster is a monster. IMO It just becomes personal taste after a six and we are no longer debating if a coin is a monster or not.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2020
    ddddd likes this.
  5. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    A5766250-330A-40BC-B2A1-FCECB21DD4D9.jpeg 57823A6F-AA8B-4B6C-AE96-66514505329B.jpeg 7228B1FF-1245-4E18-BD6A-40CDF0BB872E.jpeg Ok it’s open I’ll put this one up couple different pics as to lighting
     
    ddddd likes this.
  6. brg5658

    brg5658 Well-Known Member

    That’s a 4.8 for me. Beautiful coin.
     
  7. thomas mozzillo

    thomas mozzillo Well-Known Member

  8. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

  9. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    4.2

    There is that blue/violet color scheme again that isn’t my favorite.
     
  10. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    5.1. I like the toning pattern. Not quite in the monster category, but solid high end toner.
    6.0 maximum is fine with me. A monster is a monster.

    @ddddd, I call next up, unless someone else is ready.
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2020
    LuxUnit likes this.
  11. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    4.1

    This one is a little unusual...while nice, I'm not completely enamored (here I will go back to the original rubric and say it's a bit lower on the scale than the example for a 4)
     
  12. brg5658

    brg5658 Well-Known Member

    @ddddd : Because in Round 2 we agree to a "personal subjective scoring" not a fixed (anchored to Morgan) schema, can we post some non-Morgans again also in this round? Variety is the spice of life...

    :cool:
     
    ddddd and Morgandude11 like this.
  13. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Yes all coins are fine :)
     
  14. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Well I’ll call this one. I love this coin 5.3 I give it. I love blue toning and the intense red is special
     
    Morgandude11 and ddddd like this.
  15. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I agree. I had at least 50 “Blue meanies” back in 2010. They sold like hot cakes in my toner sell-off in 2015-2016, for excellent prices.
     
    Mainebill likes this.
  16. Brian Livesey

    Brian Livesey Member

    I'll give it a 4.5 nice one
     
  17. wxcoin

    wxcoin Getting no respect since I was a baby

    I'll give it a 4.9
     
  18. brg5658

    brg5658 Well-Known Member

    Is the Morgan closed?

    I have a coin ready whenever @ddddd ! :D
     
  19. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Summary Chapter 1
    Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs You -> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 3: 1881-S Morgan PCGS MS65 [Rev]...CT -> 3 (Mid) vs You -> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 4: 1880-S Morgan PCGS MS65 [Obv]...CT -> 4.6 (Mid-High) vs You -> 5 (High)
    Rd. 5: 1880-S Morgan NGC MS66* [Obv]...CT -> 3.2 (Mid) vs You -> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 6: 1880-S Morgan PCGS MS?? [Rev]...CT -> 3.5 (Mid) vs You -> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 7: 1887 Morgan PCGS MS64 [Obv]...CT-> 4.2 (Mid-High) vs You-> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 8: 1939-D Lincoln PCGS MS65RB [Obv]...CT-> 4.1 (Mid-High) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 9: 1972-D Ike PCGS MS63 [Obv]...CT-> 2.3 (Low-Mid) vs You-> 2 (Low-Mid)
    Rd. 10: 1892 GB Half Crown PCGS MS64 [Dual]...CT-> 4 (Mid-High) vs You-> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 11: 1967 UK Half Crown PCGS MS65+ [Dual]...CT-> 3 (Mid) vs You-> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 12: 1963 Franklin NGC MS65+* FBL [Rev]...CT-> 4 (Mid-High) vs You-> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 13: 1884-O Morgan PCGS MS63+ [Obv]...CT -> 5 (High) vs You -> 5 (High)
    Rd. 14: 1899 GB 6 Pence PCGS MS65 [Dual]...CT-> 5 (High) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 15: 1926 F.I.C. Piastre PCGS AU58 [Dual]...CT-> 3 (Mid) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 16: 1904 USP Peso NGC PF62 [Dual]...CT-> 2.8 (Low-Mid) vs You-> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 17: 1944 Jeff Nickel PCGS MS 66 [Obv]...CT-> 4.8 (Mid-High) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 18: 1880-S Morgan PCGS MS 66+ [Obv]...CT-> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs You-> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 19: 1881-S Morgan PCGS MS 68+ [Obv]...CT-> 6 (Monster) vs You-> 6 (Monster)
    Rd. 20: 1887 Morgan PCGS MS 66+ [Obv]...CT-> 5.3 (High) vs You-> 6 (Monster)
    Rd. 21: 1880-S Morgan NGC MS 66* [Obv]...CT-> 4.5 (Mid-High) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 22: 1941-D Jeff Nickel NGC MS 67* 5FS [Dual]...CT-> 4.9 (Mid-High) vs You-> 6 (Monster)
    Rd. 23: 1961 Franklin 50c PCGS PR 65 [Dual]...CT-> 5.3 (High) vs You-> 6 (Monster)
    Rd. 24: 1884-O Morgan NGC MS 61* [Obv]...CT-> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs You-> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 25: 1941-D Jeff Nickel PCGS MS 66 FS [Dual]...CT-> 3.6 (Mid) vs You-> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 26: 1708 GB Shilling PCGS MS64 [Dual]...CT-> 2.8 (Low-Mid) vs You-> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 27: 1880-S Morgan PCGS MS64 PL [Rev]...CT -> 5 (High) vs You -> 5 (High)
    Rd. 28: 1835 10c PCGS AU58 [Rev]...CT -> 3.9 (Mid) vs You -> 5 (High)
    Rd. 29: 1888 Morgan PCGS MS65+ [Obv]...CT -> 4 (Mid-High) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 30: 1904-O Morgan NGC MS64 [Dual]...CT -> 3 (Mid) vs You -> 2 (Low-Mid)

    Summary Chapter 2
    Rd. 31: 1878 8tf Morgan PCGS MS66 [Obv]...CT -> 5.5 (High) vs You -> 6.0 (Monster)
    Rd. 32: 1880-s Morgan PCGS MS63 [Obv]...CT -> 4.7 (Mid-High) vs You -> 5.3 (High)
     
  20. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Just closed it now.
    @Morgandude11 and you are the two in line, so whoever is ready can post and then the other one can post next.
     
  21. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    51A4752E-BBC2-4E63-A4D5-0CCFB2A5741E.jpeg A3B7D400-AAFD-4001-835A-81B4DDD6D058.jpeg

    1881s MS 66*
    Photography courtesy of @jhonecash.com
     
    Last edited: Aug 30, 2020
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page