Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The Modesty of Emperors
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Sulla80, post: 4783606, member: 99456"]Thanks all for the nice coins and comments.</p><p>I don't mind at all, quite the contrary - quite pleased to see a denarius with Pater Patria spelled out in Latin.</p><p><br /></p><blockquote><p><font size="4"><i>"There is a good chance that Nerva, 'the last strictly Italian emperor', was also the first to accept PP immediately upon his accession on 18 September 96. His advanced age and long career in the senate must have counted heavily." </i></font></p><p><font size="4"><i>-Stevenson, T. (2007). <a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/42666935" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/42666935" rel="nofollow">Roman Coins and Refusals of the Title "Pater Patriae"</a>.</i></font></p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>You do pull out some very nice coins <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> ...by this time the senate was pretty ineffective and there wasn't much left of republican sensibilities and traditional honors.</p><p>Sometime during the period covered in RIC VIII - Jovian <font face="Times New Roman"><font size="5">DN IOVIANVS PF PP AVG</font></font> (AD 363-364) appears to be the latest (not 100% certain):</p><p><img src="https://www.acsearch.info/media/images/archive/30/2/30301.s.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>and thanks for sharing the changing meaning of PP on Byzantine coins and late roman coins, I was not aware of this. From <a href="https://www.davidrsear.com/academy/roman_legends.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.davidrsear.com/academy/roman_legends.html" rel="nofollow">Sear's website</a>:</p><p><br /></p><blockquote><p><font size="3"><b>"PERP</b> or <b>PP</b> = Perpetuus, 'Continuous'. In the early Empire this indicated the holding of a specific office for life, eg CENS(or) PERP(petuus) under Domitian. However, from the late 5th century into Byzantine times it replaced the traditional 'P F', standing on its own as an Imperial title immediately preceding that of Augustus."</font></p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>Very interesting to see the two coins paired from Claudius. As Mattingly, and others, assign acceptance of PP by Claudius to Jan-42, I think (not 100% confident) that your second coin is therefore AD 41/42.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Sulla80, post: 4783606, member: 99456"]Thanks all for the nice coins and comments. I don't mind at all, quite the contrary - quite pleased to see a denarius with Pater Patria spelled out in Latin. [INDENT][SIZE=4][I]"There is a good chance that Nerva, 'the last strictly Italian emperor', was also the first to accept PP immediately upon his accession on 18 September 96. His advanced age and long career in the senate must have counted heavily." [/I] [I]-Stevenson, T. (2007). [URL='http://www.jstor.org/stable/42666935']Roman Coins and Refusals of the Title "Pater Patriae"[/URL].[/I][/SIZE][/INDENT] You do pull out some very nice coins :) ...by this time the senate was pretty ineffective and there wasn't much left of republican sensibilities and traditional honors. Sometime during the period covered in RIC VIII - Jovian [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=5]DN IOVIANVS PF PP AVG[/SIZE][/FONT] (AD 363-364) appears to be the latest (not 100% certain): [IMG]https://www.acsearch.info/media/images/archive/30/2/30301.s.jpg[/IMG] and thanks for sharing the changing meaning of PP on Byzantine coins and late roman coins, I was not aware of this. From [URL='https://www.davidrsear.com/academy/roman_legends.html']Sear's website[/URL]: [INDENT][SIZE=3][B]"PERP[/B] or [B]PP[/B] = Perpetuus, 'Continuous'. In the early Empire this indicated the holding of a specific office for life, eg CENS(or) PERP(petuus) under Domitian. However, from the late 5th century into Byzantine times it replaced the traditional 'P F', standing on its own as an Imperial title immediately preceding that of Augustus."[/SIZE][/INDENT] Very interesting to see the two coins paired from Claudius. As Mattingly, and others, assign acceptance of PP by Claudius to Jan-42, I think (not 100% confident) that your second coin is therefore AD 41/42.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The Modesty of Emperors
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...