Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The Mint really took it back...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="19Lyds, post: 2376501, member: 15929"]Wow. If that's the absolute case then virtually every error coin ever produced should be confiscated since by definition, they should ever have been released.</p><p>This specifically should address certain "manufactured Proof Coins" which were smuggled out of the US Mint in San Francisco since the coins them selves would have never made it through the packaging process!</p><p><br /></p><p>The coin was "given" to the recipient by the US Mint in Denver along with other error coins "not authorized for circulation" but kept around anyway.</p><p><br /></p><p>Exactly where is the line drawn between "authorized" and "unauthorized" as it seems to me that the line is intentionally "obscured" depending upon circumstance.</p><p><br /></p><p>Does the US Mint at Denver (they are the one's that gave the coin) NOT have the "authority" to issue US Coins? Is every single piece produced by "the facility" individually "authorized" for release?</p><p><br /></p><p>IMO, the US Mint at Denver has the authority to "release" certain coins to the US Public as legal tender and this particular coin along with other "non-releasable coins" (i.e. errors) was presented to a retiring employee as a "gift". Of course, folks can argue the letter of the so called law with the specific interpretation of "it should not have happened" but the fact remains that it "DID" happen and as such was completely legal under all interpretations.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="19Lyds, post: 2376501, member: 15929"]Wow. If that's the absolute case then virtually every error coin ever produced should be confiscated since by definition, they should ever have been released. This specifically should address certain "manufactured Proof Coins" which were smuggled out of the US Mint in San Francisco since the coins them selves would have never made it through the packaging process! The coin was "given" to the recipient by the US Mint in Denver along with other error coins "not authorized for circulation" but kept around anyway. Exactly where is the line drawn between "authorized" and "unauthorized" as it seems to me that the line is intentionally "obscured" depending upon circumstance. Does the US Mint at Denver (they are the one's that gave the coin) NOT have the "authority" to issue US Coins? Is every single piece produced by "the facility" individually "authorized" for release? IMO, the US Mint at Denver has the authority to "release" certain coins to the US Public as legal tender and this particular coin along with other "non-releasable coins" (i.e. errors) was presented to a retiring employee as a "gift". Of course, folks can argue the letter of the so called law with the specific interpretation of "it should not have happened" but the fact remains that it "DID" happen and as such was completely legal under all interpretations.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The Mint really took it back...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...