Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
'The Metallurgy of Roman Silver Coinage'
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="jyrki muona, post: 2841874, member: 89709"]Even one coin is a "sample". More is better, of course, but that may not be possible.</p><p>I will give an example. I had a hypothesis that PONT MAX Othos are debased sharply so and the change of the reverse legend is a sign of that. I started looking for reverses that would share the obverse die with a SECVRITAS or PAX issue. Finally I succeeded, obtained the missing coin and Ponting tested them for me, "destroying" the coins with a minute hole on the side. He even offered to have a professional restore them, but I declined as I am proud of having been able to contribute.</p><p>There were two PONT MAXes and on SECVRITAS sharing an obverse die and indeed, the PONT MAXes were about 80% silver and the SECVRITAS was 90%. Now, this was a sample collected to test a hypothesis made BEFORE the act. It was shown to hold. I can scientifically soundly now say: prove this wrong with another sample. Unless this can be done, these three coins are enough.</p><p>This is not the same thing as randomly observing such a phenomenon.</p><p>And the coins are certainly not destroyed.</p><p>Jyrki Muona[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="jyrki muona, post: 2841874, member: 89709"]Even one coin is a "sample". More is better, of course, but that may not be possible. I will give an example. I had a hypothesis that PONT MAX Othos are debased sharply so and the change of the reverse legend is a sign of that. I started looking for reverses that would share the obverse die with a SECVRITAS or PAX issue. Finally I succeeded, obtained the missing coin and Ponting tested them for me, "destroying" the coins with a minute hole on the side. He even offered to have a professional restore them, but I declined as I am proud of having been able to contribute. There were two PONT MAXes and on SECVRITAS sharing an obverse die and indeed, the PONT MAXes were about 80% silver and the SECVRITAS was 90%. Now, this was a sample collected to test a hypothesis made BEFORE the act. It was shown to hold. I can scientifically soundly now say: prove this wrong with another sample. Unless this can be done, these three coins are enough. This is not the same thing as randomly observing such a phenomenon. And the coins are certainly not destroyed. Jyrki Muona[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
'The Metallurgy of Roman Silver Coinage'
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...