Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;briac michaux, post: 10817035, member: 143064&quot;]the 1st fault have been made by the authors when they refered in title &quot;roman emperor&quot; this mention tells us directly that the authors believe in the existence of Sponsianus and do not make the difference between an emperor (authority recognized by the senate) and a usurper who only ruled a tiny part of the empire for a very short time</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>you did perfectly resume the situation, there is no scientifical evidences for the existence of Sponsianus.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in